More Than The Removal of A Link
As of today I have removed an original link posted on this blog at its inception: Quack Watch.
It has been removed not because it contains some valuable information not otherwise available on actual quacks involved in food issues, but because the founder himself has become embroiled in a widening mess of legal controversy that centers himself on the definition quackery itself. Here is a link, out of many, that addresses this issue http://www.quackpotwatch.org/ There is also information on Quakwatch itself, http://www.quackwatch.com/
The legal mess at Quack Watch has thrown a cloud of concern over the credibility of watching quacks.
Yet, the problem remains for all who seek a balanced and credible assessment of Controversial Food Issues: what's for real (and can be trusted, perhaps, with your life) and what's fake and must be discarded (before it submerges you in illusion and, perhaps, kills you).
It has been removed not because it contains some valuable information not otherwise available on actual quacks involved in food issues, but because the founder himself has become embroiled in a widening mess of legal controversy that centers himself on the definition quackery itself. Here is a link, out of many, that addresses this issue http://www.quackpotwatch.org/ There is also information on Quakwatch itself, http://www.quackwatch.com/
The legal mess at Quack Watch has thrown a cloud of concern over the credibility of watching quacks.
Yet, the problem remains for all who seek a balanced and credible assessment of Controversial Food Issues: what's for real (and can be trusted, perhaps, with your life) and what's fake and must be discarded (before it submerges you in illusion and, perhaps, kills you).
posted by Herb Dreyer at 1:09 PM
0 comments
